Tag Archive for 'business-photography'

07
Aug

The business of photography

Beau Frusetta Avatar/Headshot

I don’t know how you feel when shopping for photography but I bet usually its a lot like Beau (pictured). Between the copyrights, prints, post processing and managed rights it can be hard to tell what it is exactly that you are purchasing, if anything. I certainly know it can be confusing, hell it even confuses me sometimes and I do this everyday. So I figured it was time for me to define a couple things for us and to make our lives a little easier.

It is my feeling that a lot of photographers who are still operating on the up sell method of business take advantage of their client’s ignorance. Most notably are the studios around town who offer discounted sitting fees to get you in the door and then nickle and dime you to death buying a bunch of things that don’t have any real value ie: prints, mattes, finishes etc.

You would think when you get to the commercial market things would change drastically. Commercially, you may deal with the management of rights, expiration, distribution limits, reproduction methods, permissions etc. But it all boils down to the same thing. Get you in the door as cheap as possible then make you pay by reducing the value of the photos. Really what is the value of an image you can’t use?

All of this amounts to a poor customer experience and a confusing market where the value of photography swings wildly around from trade for prints (free) to upwards of $75,000 a day.

Business of photography definitions:

The following are what I consider the most important words to understand when purchasing photography.

Image: The digital file, negative or print that is the deliverable product. This can be confusing because the same image of Beau (pictured) can be delivered in more than one way and each way counts as a separate photograph.

Copyright: AKA © That little symbol still carries a lot of power (although maybe a little misguided at the moment) and it is the greatest tool a photographer has to control the value of their product. A firm and clear understanding of what copyright means is a great asset to anyone who hopes to purchase or sell photography.

Grant of Rights: The means by which the photographer sells the images from a photo session. Defines the manner in which the images maybe used by the client.

Managed Rights: If you have ever purchased a portrait session or bought prints from a photographer you have already experienced rights management. It is most easily understood as the restriction on the clients ability to copy or distribute the photos. In the commercial world all aspects can be defined and include expiration of rights, limited geographic distribution and even number, type and size of reproduction. Sometimes the client may even be required to check in with the photographer so they can approve any reproduction before it goes to press.

Exclusive: Means the rights granted are specific to the entity that purchased them, they cannot be transferred and you cannot sell the images to others.

Watermark: Traditionally: A logo or text that is overlaid on the image to discourage unauthorized reproduction. (example: when I post to flickr) Now: I use it as a way to lower the entry level to my photography, and hope that it is a discreetly placed logo and byline. I get the continued advertising and you get an entry level price.

Byline: Is a phrase on the photograph or accompanying the photograph that states legibly: “image by tyson crosbie”. Amy Lamp has an excellent example of an accompanying byline.

Time Value

It has been my intention from the beginning to run an open and transparent photography business; to place value on my own abilities instead of on the products or tools that I sell and use. Personally I value my time as a photographer and that is what I intend to spend the majority of my time doing. I know this makes for a much better customer experience and is exactly why I have a single rate. I don’t up sell anything, I let my clients manage themselves and my contract is only one page long.

I hope to have turned the photo market a little bit on its head by not managing my clients rights to the extent that I become a policeman and by being up front about what I believe my time is worth. It is by directly respecting clients and also valuing their time and intelligence that I have built a loyal and valuable clientele.

Comments

I’d love to hear any thoughts about your past, present or future experiences with the business of photography. Did I miss anything? Is there more I can do to simplify the client experience?

19
May

controling your brand online- The Avatar

AVATAR: An incarnation, embodiment or manifestation of a person or idea.
Chuck Reynolds final

A traditional headshot in the past was used to present an image of professionalism to potential clients and business partners. The likelihood of anyone outside of this narrow group ever seeing the image remained minimal at best, your pr firm may have used it in a brochure or even put it on your business card. Traditionally these business portraits were used to build trust with people who may not have constant contact with you, professions like lawyers and real estate agents frequently updated their headshot to show their client they can still smile. (okay that last part was a dig from me.)

Google changed everything. Now it is standard practice to google new hires and potential clients prior to meeting them and see the drunken pictures from that frat party in college on your myspace page and the business headshot in the brochure. There is a merging of personal and professional lives that is more often than not referred to as Personal Branding or Gary Vaynerchuk- (made you look) :)
The definition for avatar above seems to cover a lot of ground and is generalized for many different applications. Let’s define it for us: A social media avatar is an online representation of who you are online. It may be a logo, text, image or picture, it may even be nothing at all. For me it is a quick way to identify contacts on my IM client or filter a constant stream of information on twirl. For most of us online an avatar is a square image that should simultaneously embody your self image and your perceived self along with representing who you are to your closest friends and how you want to be perceived by strangers.

Look at your current Avatar– Is that image really accomplishing these tasks?

Heather Herr final

There are almost as many ways to use social media tools as there are people using them.

One of the ways I am trying to use these tools is to open up the process of photography to my audience. I recently started a new flickr account called tysoncrosbieEdit, it is a place where an audience can go to see a soft edit from a photo shoot and through participating there can make a difference in the final decisions. MsHerr for example posted on her blog an open invite to her community to crowd source her final selection. Effectively leaving the entire process of selecting her online identity to an audience that already interacted with her in this online space. A brave move certainly, but when considering personal branding in social media it is important to understand the perceptions of your audience as well as you understand your own motivations for using this space and the only way to gain that understanding is to allow for participation.

Whether we like it or not education changes us, and the experience of participating (even if it is just to say “I like this one.”) garners understanding. The end result is a community that understands the tools and the process, and that community is better equipped to make judgments when hiring their next photographer. It is this potential to educate a broader audience about good photography vs bad that really excites me.

Participation requested below, leave a comment and help me understand.